Zuma Vs. Puzz Loop

Discussion in 'Indie Business' started by simonh, Jan 19, 2006.

  1. Savant

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's a monstrous difference between borrowing and cloning.
     
  2. Bmc

    Bmc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    2
    way to misinterpret.

    i was referring to your comment on how I would feel if someone cloned my game.

    also: nice name dropping, names don't mean **** to me. ******* other peoples egoes is for followers and I'm a leader baby... a leader

    (edited by retro64: keep it professional)
     
    #42 Bmc, Jan 20, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 20, 2006
  3. mahlzeit

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    1
    But you're only a leader if you have followers. ;)
     
  4. Bmc

    Bmc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    2
    i'm just kidding around ;)
     
  5. cliffski

    Moderator Original Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    what are you talking about? how is this name dropping? Im not claiming these are my mates. And how on earth am I misinterpreting your defence of blatant cloning exactly??
     
  6. Hiro_Antagonist

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    While the game is actively selling and being marketed might be a reasonable place to draw the line...
     
  7. luggage

    Moderator Original Member Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    So they crossed it with Zuma then I guess. Puzz Loop 2 was released in 2001, as far as I know Zuma was released 2003. Two years doesn't seem very long does it?
     
  8. Bmc

    Bmc New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    2
    just play Puzz Loop, then play Zuma

    Zuma beats the living shit out of PuzzLoop in every single aspect (except being first)

    Also, from what I hear there are only 5 stages all together in Puzz Loop (the one on the portals), which is ridiculous.
     
  9. luggage

    Moderator Original Member Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's not the point though.

    Well, unless you're saying that it's fine to rip off another game so long as some people think the new version is better? Some could argue that err.. "other" clones are better than the original game...
     
  10. svero

    Moderator Original Member Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    6
    Well for my part I have to support games like Zuma being made. Not because I've cloned or am cloning... but simply because zuma.. unlike its predecessor was a really fun game. Puzz loop... despite having the idea first... had such a lousy implementation that it offered little to the player. Does that mean we should forever just shut that basic idea down and never iterate from it? never create a new game based on the same concept? At what point is a game different enough to be called new? Space Invaders -> galaxian -> galaga -- surely at least galaxian and galaga are very similar. Maybe zuma doesnt introduce all that many new elements but it does introduce some.. a lot of them in the subtlety of he implementation. If allowing that, opens up the door to people making a cheap reskinned clone with nothing new at all in it.. well that's a price Im willing to pay.
     
  11. Anthony Flack

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wasn't Galaga the sequel to Galaxian?
     
  12. EJSainz

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not necessarily. Almost every of us can tell appart a clone from a newly done game. As an example, I'm right now developing a game that's unavoidably inspired by Bubble Bobble, Snow Brothers, and games like those, but when you'll be seeing it you'll find the mechanics are really very different. Not on walking, of course, but in the way to clean the enemies.

    In fact, when you compare Bubble Bobble and Snow Brothers you know they are not clones: they use the same "one screen platformer - kill'em all" concept, but the mechanics are so different and the few elements they have are so far from each other that you have to agree that they are not clones.
     
  13. EJSainz

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of course they've borrowed other ideas from other games (and not necessarily computer games), but their games are just fresh, different, you can't say "hey, this whole games is just like that other game".

    Being original doesn't mean starting an idea from 0, but developing it to an extent that the idea becomes just different to all other ideas you were basing yours on. I like the example of the first "Commandos": it's a bit like an RTS, then it's a bit like Metal Gear, then it's a bit like ... but when you played it, you knew you just had never played something like that before. And that's originality.
     
  14. svero

    Moderator Original Member Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    6
    Well I dont know if it was or it wasn't. The point isn't so much who makes the better or more evolved or even different flavour game. The point is that I see some value in the variations. I know John Raptis was annoyed by Faires, and I can certainly understand where he's coming from, but at the same time faries did bring some things to the table that I appreciated as a player that chuzzle lacked (and vice versa). The same is true of Zuma. I think we'd be poorer in some ways without these versions. That being said I think I'd be in favour of some time lapse between a game like chuzzle and faries.. say a year.. but it's so hard to quantify exactly what's meant and how to do it. In the absence of a simple system to prevent so called parasite cloning, I guess Id have to err on the side of allowing copies for the diversity they introduce. Zuma was puzz loop and yet... in so many ways it was not. Zuma was a game I played to death, and puzz loop one I put aside after a few sessions. Surely therefor they're not the same.
     
  15. Anthony Flack

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,176
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yup, and there lies the danger of trying to legislate these sorts of things. But if recent trends continue, court battles are surely on the way sooner or later. Since lawsuits would obviously be destructive, while an industry built on systematic parasitic cloning would also be destructive (not least because it would encourage lawsuits), I always advocated a simple, non-enforcable policy of just trying to be reasonable. Some people will laugh at that. But the least we can do is just try to be reasonable ourselves, and not take such an amoral* attitude towards our businesses. After all, we here are a community of sorts. We shouldn't need legislation to stop us from turning on ourselves.

    * nb: different word to immoral.

    (Oh, and yeah, Galaga is the sequel to Galaxian - I looked it up. I know it was just an example, but there ya go)
     
  16. princec

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,873
    Likes Received:
    0
    You'd be surprised at the vehemence some people can exhibit when they don't understand your point of view. I gather ErikH would gladly shop me to the FBI if I gave my dad and a few friends a copy of my full version of DRoD, whereas I'd actually encourage him to allow his friends and family to register Ultratron under his email address. Small differences of opinion can sometimes lead to big fights. Over a few dollars.

    Cas :)
     
  17. Savant

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, there's opinion and there's law. One is arguable, the other is not. You may not like the law, may not agree with it, etc. but that doesn't change the fact that the line of right and wrong has been established.

    And no, I won't be getting into this any further because I can already see the response that will be written up to this. And then my response to that, and so on. Just wanted to make my point and I'm done.
     
  18. Stu

    Stu
    Original Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's your opinion.

    And you're wrong. :p
     
  19. Savant

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're saying that law is arguable?
     
  20. mahlzeit

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's why we have judges and lawyers. They argue. ;)
     

Share This Page

  • About Indie Gamer

    When the original Dexterity Forums closed in 2004, Indie Gamer was born and a diverse community has grown out of a passion for creating great games. Here you will find over 10 years of in-depth discussion on game design, the business of game development, and marketing/sales. Indie Gamer also provides a friendly place to meet up with other Developers, Artists, Composers and Writers.
  • Buy us a beer!

    Indie Gamer is delicately held together by a single poor bastard who thankfully gets help from various community volunteers. If you frequent this site or have found value in something you've learned here, help keep the site running by donating a few dollars (for beer of course)!

    Sure, I'll Buy You a Beer