Google Censoring Websites!

Discussion in 'Indie Business' started by soniCron, Sep 20, 2006.

  1. arcadetown

    Moderator Original Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,476
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. tone

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Censorship" implies they squelched access to the site. They didn't do that.

    tone
     
  3. soniCron

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Check a dictionary before you chastise my lexicon:

    censor - To remove or suppress
    suppress - To reduce the incidence or severity of

    Save the 3rd grade vocabulary lessons for GameDev.net.
     
  4. Adrian Lopez

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have a program called HideWindow on my website that's been tagged by various antivirus and anti-spyware vendors as malware. Avast flagged it as a trojan until I demanded they correct such a false allegation, and they responded by changing its classification to "hack tool". :rolleyes: It is unfortunate that hackers have used it to distribute malicious scripts, because the program itself is designed for legitimate purposes. Hidewindow uses the Win32 API, so any programmer familiar with the API could write software to run hidden programs in a matter of minutes. Why not focus on the actual scripts instead of legitimate tools that might be used for unlawful purposes? That kind of thing really gets on my nerves.

    Fighting malware is an admirable goal, but paranoid warnings are not the solution. I'd rather see the law punish the distribution of malware as it punishes the distribution of viruses. At least then we'd have a well-defined standard rather than the various and sometimes broad standards employed by individual anti-malware companies.
     
  5. David De Candia

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    I watched a good documentary recently focussing on the topic "What if Google turned evil".

    The basic concern was that if we let one central body (however benevolent) control the bulk of information flow then we are basically begging for trouble in the long term. I wish I could recall the title, as it was well worth viewing and was directly in line with Daniel's concerns.
     
  6. soniCron

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. jankoM

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know why a lot of people is worried about the google global info domination because alexa still puts google on no.3 and we can allways count on MS (no.2) to save us from this monopoly ;)

    I am trying to say ... that it's hard to talk of monopoly if there are 3 big players there. And top of net is still so dynamic that if someone becomes "evil" or dumb another one can quickly take his place... just the example of google shows that... another one is youtube vs. google videos where AFAIK you-tube came out of nowhere and kicked his ***
     
  8. David De Candia

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, nice researching, err... Googling :) Yes - that's the one.
     
  9. soniCron

    Indie Author

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. dustin1138

    Original Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think good arguments are being made on both sides. I'm having a hard time agreeing/disagreeing with either.

    So, instead I'll spin it in a direction that no one has gone yet. Maybe this is a Lawyer created idea...

    John Doe wants to download the latest and greatest game, for free. He does a "gameXYZ cracked" google search and then clicks on the warez link... wham! His computer is infected to the point of non-functioning. He could look at the situation in one of three ways: 1) his own fault for being stupid, 2) sue the unknown hidden warez site, 3) sue the gazillion dollar Google corporation for causing him to 'destroy' his machine. At least here in the sue-happy US, I'm afraid many would choose #3 if given the option.

    Maybe this is the internet equivalent to the label that comes on hairdryers that warn you to not use it while still in the shower. :p
     

Share This Page

  • About Indie Gamer

    When the original Dexterity Forums closed in 2004, Indie Gamer was born and a diverse community has grown out of a passion for creating great games. Here you will find over 10 years of in-depth discussion on game design, the business of game development, and marketing/sales. Indie Gamer also provides a friendly place to meet up with other Developers, Artists, Composers and Writers.
  • Buy us a beer!

    Indie Gamer is delicately held together by a single poor bastard who thankfully gets help from various community volunteers. If you frequent this site or have found value in something you've learned here, help keep the site running by donating a few dollars (for beer of course)!

    Sure, I'll Buy You a Beer